Cases 1 - 10 of 223
Mason v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv02362
Plaintiff:
Reginald Mason
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
Jonathan Rice
Respondent:
Warden Joshua Jones, Tyrone Oliver, Officer Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. (GDC) Legal Division et al
as 1:2024cv02334
Plaintiff:
Mr. Charlie Lamonte McKinney, Jr.
Defendant:
(GDC) Legal Division, Office of Professional Standards, Governor Brian Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Sales et al
as 1:2024cv01474
Petitioner:
Jaylin Bell
Respondent:
Timothy Sales and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holliman v. Oliver et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Octavius Holliman
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Joshua Jones, Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Clemons et al
as 1:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Bianca D. Reaves
Defendant:
Chanae Q. Clemons, Levon Allen, Officer Jeff Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillps v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01245
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Phillps
Defendant:
John Doe, Lieutenant Swats, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Oliver et al
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver and Christopher M Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson Sr. v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv02097
Plaintiff:
King B.M. Ferguson Sr. and Blaane A. Oteo
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Charles Mims, Richard Timothy Hamil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
