Cases 1 - 10 of 1,687
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Harding-Jones v. City of Atlanta, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01796
Plaintiff:
Heather Harding-Jones
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Georgia and Kone, Inc,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jones v. Dillard's Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02626
Plaintiff:
Demetria Jones
Defendant:
Dillard's Inc. and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
2425 Candler, LLC v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02575
Plaintiff:
2425 Candler, LLC doing business as Candler Village
Defendant:
Derrick Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Lenz v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv01510
Plaintiff:
Dakota Lenz
Defendant:
Warden Deshawn Jones, Deputy Warden Polite and Lt Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Unit Manager Porter and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv01694
Plaintiff:
Randy Butler, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Jenee Jones and Linda T. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
