Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Pickens v. Conway et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv03157
Defendant: R. L. (Butch) Conway, Correct Care Solutions, Dr. Shahzad Hashmi and others
Plaintiff: Geoffrey Craig Pickens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellison v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03002
Plaintiff: Jessica Ellison
Defendant: Corizon Health, Inc. , R.L. Butch Conway , Mark Ferrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Corizon Health et al
as 1:2018cv01528
Plaintiff: De'Andre Armhan Hardy
Defendant: Corizon Health, Ted Jackson, Harpo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiPietro v. Medical Staff at Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv01036
Plaintiff: Robert Ralph DiPietro
Defendant: Medical Staff at Fulton County Jail, Corizon Health Services, George Herron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Gwinnett County, Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv02659
Plaintiff: Joe Nathan Clark
Defendant: Gwinnett County, Georgia, Corizon Health , Bautista and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodrigues v. Corizon Health Care et al
as 1:2017cv01736
Plaintiff: Angel Rodrigues
Defendant: Corizon Health Care, Correctional Care Services and R.L. Butch Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forte v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01096
Plaintiff: Ashleigh Forte
Defendant: Corizon Health, Inc. , Corizon, LLC , Butch Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King v. Corizon
as 1:2017cv00622
Plaintiff: Elijah Isaiah King
Defendant: Corizon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00272
Plaintiff: Ricky David Tate
Defendant: Corizon Health Inc. and Butch Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kim v. Conway et al
as 1:2017cv00253
Plaintiff: Ki Song Kim
Defendant: Butch Conway, Gwinnett County Detention Center and Corizon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?