Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Staten v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Penny Staten
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hines et al v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03790
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Hines and David M. Hines
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Eppich v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01999
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Eppich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sweat v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04322
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and John Does Nos. 1-10
Plaintiff:
Myron Sweat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04927
Plaintiff:
Steven Lewis
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scipio v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02636
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Livingston Scipio, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Essex Insurance Company v. Do It All Investment Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03120
Plaintiff:
Essex Insurance Company
Defendant:
Do It All Investment Group, Inc., Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. et al v. Woodall Roofing Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02566
Plaintiff:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Company
Defendant:
Woodall Roofing Co., Inc. and Do It All Investment Group, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Woodall Roofing Co., Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Do It All Investment Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
