Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jolly v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03956
Plaintiff:
Tenama Jolly
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Womens Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00241
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jolly v. Garland Gehrke Trucking, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00246
Plaintiff:
Andra Marcus Jolly
Defendant:
ABC Corp., Acuity, John Does (1-3) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawrence v. Taylor et al
as 1:2017cv05094
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lawrence
Defendant:
Taylor, Thomas, Major Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdul-Hakeem v. Paragon Systems et al
as 1:2016mi00044
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Latif Abdul-Hakeem
Defendant:
Paragon Systems, James E. Freeze, W. Ralph Basham and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Abdul-Hakeem et al v. Paragon Systems et al
as 1:2015cv02415
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Latif Abdul-Hakeem
Defendant:
Paragon Systems, James E. Freeze, W. Ralph Basham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laskar v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia et al
as 1:2013cv01609
Plaintiff:
Joy Laskar
Defendant:
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, G.P. "Bud" Peterson, Kenneth R. Bernard, Jr. and others
Jolly v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv02947
Plaintiff:
Laurant Jolly
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC and Does 1 - 20
Cause Of Action: 50 U.S.C. § 0533
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03157
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
