Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Dixon v. Shiver et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joey Dixon
Defendant:
Blake Shiver, Georgia State Patrol Department, Blake Shivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 4:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Devonte Rains
Defendant:
Brian Coleman, Roy Odum, Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Georgia Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2022cv01267
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Public Safety, Officer R. Schofill and Officer Shiver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harper v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv01763
Plaintiff:
James Shivers Harper
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, James E. Donald, Brian Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonanno v. Troup County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bonanno
Defendant:
Marty Reeves and Shivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Forte v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01096
Plaintiff:
Ashleigh Forte
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc. , Corizon, LLC , Butch Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harper v. GA Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv03312
Plaintiff:
James Shivers Harper
Defendant:
GA Department of Corrections, Brian Owens, Rhonda Billings and others
Harper v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv03314
Plaintiff:
James Shivers Harper
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Brian Owens, Rhonda Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00442
Plaintiff:
James Shivers Harper
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Brian Owens, Rhonda Billings and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
