Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The State of Georgia v. Still
as 1:2023cv03792
Plaintiff:
The State of Georgia
Defendant:
Shawn Micah Tresher Still
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Houston v. Padlps et al
as 1:2021cv03806
Plaintiff:
Eric Houston
Defendant:
S. W. Padlps, N. Arnold, Nurse Still and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stills v. TEVA PHARMACEUTCIALS USA, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00887
Defendant:
TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC., TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH, INC., TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH, LLC doing business as TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Stills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Allergan USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00797
Defendant:
John Doe's 1-2, ABC Corp., Alicia Still and others
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stevens v. Harper et al
as 3:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jason E. Stevens
Defendant:
Harper, Dave Still and Breana Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. The Khoshnood Law Firm, P.C. et al
as 1:2013cv03026
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
The Khoshnood Law Firm, P.C., Hooman Khoshnood and Clinton A. Still
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Still v. Khoshnood Law Firm PC et al
as 1:2013cv00748
Plaintiff:
Clinton A. Still
Defendant:
Khoshnood Law Firm PC and Hooman Khoshnood
Misty Creek et al v. Still
as 1:2012cv02827
Plaintiff:
Misty Creek and R James Properties Inc.
Defendant:
Robin Still
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
