Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hernandez v. The Geo Group Inc.
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Manuel Prado Hernandez
Defendant:
The Geo Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivadeneira v. D. Ray James Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2021cv00012
Defendant:
Mr. T. Johns, D. Ray James Correctional Facility, Dr. Rick Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Felipe Ignacio Rivadeneira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayer v. Johns et al
as 5:2020cv00028
Petitioner:
Stephen Mayer
Respondent:
The GEO Group, Inc., United States of America and T. Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Guentangue v. Rivas et al
as 5:2020cv00009
Plaintiff:
Patrick M. Guentangue
Defendant:
Major F. Rivas, Patrick Gartland, GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. D. Ray James Private Institution et al
as 5:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Mr. Norman, E. Dye, Ms. Sprulles and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Suarez Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerez-Toco v. Johns et al
as 5:2016cv00077
Petitioner:
Nery Jerez-Toco
Respondent:
Tracy Johns, Geo Group Inc., George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Oluigbo-Bernards v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Festus Oluigbo-Bernards
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc. and D. Ray James Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosa-Delgado v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Rosa-Delgado
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Medic Department, Tracy Johns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez v. D. Ray James Correction Facility et al
as 5:2016cv00012
Petitioner:
Ricardo Padilla Nunez
Respondent:
D. Ray James Correction Facility, Tracy Johns, Geo Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Scotton v. Johns et al
as 5:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Rogerio Chaves Scotton
Defendant:
Tracy Johns, Geo Group Inc., George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
