Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Talley v. Glynn County Detention Center et al
as 2:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
Michael Shannon Talley
Defendant:
Glynn County Detention Center, Gunderson, Kidder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Magruder et al
as 6:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Karl C. Mitchell
Defendant:
Andrew M. Magruder, Marty C. Allen, Dean Broome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Core Civic's Policy et al
as 6:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Willie Frank Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Core Civic's Policy, Trinity Food Service, Robert Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatt v. Muscogee County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00180
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Wyatt
Defendant:
Muscogee County Jail, Collins, Lenard Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PNC Bank, National Association et al v. Kentucky Pain Group, PSC et al
as 2:2016mc00006
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association and PNC Equipment Finance, LLC
Defendant:
Kentucky Pain Group, PSC, Kentucky Pain Physicians, PC, Physician Services, P.S.C. and others
Daker v. Bryson et al
as 6:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Brian Owens, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Flourney
as 2:2016cv00051
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Lane
Respondent:
J.V. Flourney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Emanuel County Board of Commissioners et al
as 6:2016cv00021
Plaintiff:
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP , Woodrow Billups and Keith McNear
Defendant:
Emanuel County Board of Commissioners, Rusty Lane, Desse Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00006
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Lane
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Messick v. USA
as 3:2015cv00082
Petitioner:
Tola Lane Messick
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
