Cases 71 - 80 of 196
Holmes v. Southern Correctional Medicine et al
as 6:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Scott Holmes
Defendant:
Southern Correctional Medicine, Tattnall County Detention Center and K. Hutley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vega v. Solicitor General, Richmond County, State of Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
Lisa Vega
Defendant:
Solicitor General, Richmond County, State of Georgia, Kellie K. McIntyre, Omeeka Loggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merritt et al v. Nexton Mining, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Evelyn S. Merritt and Sharon L. Merritt McMillen
Defendant:
Nexton Mining, Inc. , Sunflower Farm & Ranch, Inc. , Steven L. Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Pate v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv00211
Plaintiff:
Detra K. Pate
Defendant:
Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Skinner v. Hall et al
as 5:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
Karonn Skinner
Defendant:
Hilton Hall, Joseph K. Mulholland, Billy Grantham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sifford v. Hall et al
as 5:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
Dwight K Sifford
Defendant:
Hilton Hall, Andrea Ford, Ricky Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaither v. Epps, et al.
as 1:2016cv00103
Plaintiff:
Russell Gaither
Defendant:
Brian K. Epps and Dudley H. Bowen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundy v. Bryson et al
as 5:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
Quintavious Lundy
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, James K. Cox, Jr., Kimberly Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundy v. Bryson et al
as 4:2016cv00182
Plaintiff:
Quintavious Lundy
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, James K. Cox, Jr., Kimberly Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alday v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
James Dale Alday
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.