Cases 81 - 90 of 94
Bush v. Camden County et al
as 2:2009cv00189
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Bush
Defendant:
Camden County, Steven Berry, Tommy Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Sutherland v. Goodrich
as 4:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
David Sutherland
Defendant:
Berry Goodrich
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Berry v. Smith et al
as 4:2008cv00201
Defendant:
John Smith, Savannah Chatham Metropolitan Police Dept., Delmonte Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Berry
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Berry v. Savannah Chatham Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 4:2008cv00225
Defendant:
Savannah Chatham Metropolitan Police Department, Delmonte Hunt and John Smith
Plaintiff:
Joseph Berry
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Berry v. Savannah Chatham Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 4:2008cv00208
Plaintiff:
Joseph Berry
Defendant:
Savannah Chatham Metropolitan Police Department, Piggly Wiggly, B. H. Frey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen v. Southeast Georgia Health System et al
as 2:2008cv00146
Plaintiff:
Dwight L. Allen
Defendant:
Southeast Georgia Health System, Camden Medical Center, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Berry v. Mayes et al
as 4:2008cv00202
Defendant:
Laprentice Mayes, Belk's Dept. Store, Morgan Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Berry
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Berry v. Mi-das Line SA et al
as 4:2008cv00159
Plaintiff:
Victor Berry
Defendant:
Mi-das Line SA, Toko Kaiun Kaisha Ltd and Mitsui Osk Lines
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Berry v. Toko Kaiun Kaisha, Ltd.
as 4:2007cv00161
Plaintiff:
Victor Berry
Defendant:
Toko Kaiun Kaisha, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
