Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Kaphan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Irene Diana Kaphan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Knuckles v. Department of Army
as 1:2016cv00164
Plaintiff:
Jeniqua Irene Knuckles
Defendant:
Department of Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Knuckles v. Department of the Army
as 1:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
Jeniqua Irene Knuckles
Defendant:
Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Green v. Keitt et al
as 4:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
William J. Green
Defendant:
Vincent Keitt, Nathaniel Keitt, Betty Keitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shuman v. Household International Inc.
as 2:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
Irene K. Shuman
Defendant:
Household International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Shuman v. Capital Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00152
Plaintiff:
Irene Shuman
Defendant:
Capital Mortgage Corporation and David O'Steen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. United States Of America
as 4:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
Irene Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Shuman v. HSBC Consumer Lending et al
as 2:2010cv00133
Plaintiff:
Irene Shuman
Defendant:
HSBC Consumer Lending , Homecomings Financial Network, LLC and McCurdy & Candler, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
