Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rios v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00150
Petitioner:
Ricardo Villanueva Rios
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Edwin v. Carter
as 3:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Ricardo Keith Edwin
Respondent:
Sidney Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Strozier v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Jamal Strozier
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Robert Toole, Stan Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Genesys Health Alliance et al
as 5:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ricardo M. Mobley
Defendant:
Genesys Health Alliance and Dr. Caraviello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Lincoln County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 1:2018cv00193
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Mandrell Mobley
Defendant:
Aries Hunter and Lincoln County Law Enforcement Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00155
Petitioner:
Ricardo Mandrell Mobley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Strozier v. Hall et al
as 3:2018cv00057
Defendant:
Phil Hall, Cathy Lewis, Fred Gammage and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Jamal Strozier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quirino et al v. Saucedo et al
as 2:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Christian Murillo Quirino , Ricardo Hernandez Quintero , Osvaldo Ruvacalba Haros and others
Defendant:
Francisco Saucedo and The Pine Straw Man, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Del Valle-Diaz v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00084
Petitioner:
Ricardo Del Valle-Diaz
Respondent:
J.V. Flournoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
