Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Brodzki v. Sioux County
as 5:2011cv04083
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brodzki
Defendant:
Sioux County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolden v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2010cv02052
Plaintiff:
Anthony Charles Bolden
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
Anthony Clark and Anthony Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hickey v. Unknown
as 1:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hickey
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
White v. United States of America
as 5:2009cv04059
Plaintiff:
Anthony M White
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lawrence v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00094
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gene Lawrence
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Securities and Exchange Commission
as 1:2009mc00058
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Donald Anthony Walker, Donald Anthony Walker, Donald Anthony Walker and others
Saddler v. United States of America
as 6:2009cv02023
Plaintiff:
Anthony Charles Saddler, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clay v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dion Clay
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nationwide Transportation, Inc v. Tony's Tire Service, Inc et al
as 3:2009cv03018
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Transportation, Inc and Nationwide Transportation, Inc
Defendant:
Tony's Tire Service, Inc and Anthony Roger Nessa
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
