Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Black v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00276
Petitioner:
Pierre Fontain Black
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Patrick H. Payton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lloyd v. Telleen et al
as 4:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Lamont Lloyd
Defendant:
John Telleen, Micah P. Johnson, Derek G. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Newnan et al
as 4:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Lamont Lloyd
Defendant:
Newnan, Vigil, Julie Lien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grider v. Black Hawk County Jail
as 4:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Tony Grider
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brothern v. Thompson et al
as 4:2019cv00375
Defendant:
Mark Herbst, Kevin Hernandez, Black Hawk County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brothern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodson v. Napha Care et al
as 4:2018cv00277
Defendant:
Judges of the First Judicial District Court of Black Hawk County, Napha Care, Black Hawk County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Goodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreno v. Ludwick et al
as 4:2014cv00414
Plaintiff:
Patrick Moreno
Defendant:
Nick Ludwick, Mark Roberts, Todd Ensminger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matlock v. Black Hawk County Sheriff's Department
as 4:2014cv00310
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Matlock
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2012cv00073
Plaintiff:
Raymond Earl Holmes, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Dawn McFarland, IMCC Records and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Hope House et al
as 4:2009cv00416
Plaintiff:
Patrick J Hughes
Defendant:
Hope House, Mick Meeks, Sam Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
