Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Edwards v. Whalen et al
as 4:2019cv00137
Defendant:
Chris Tripp, Rebecca Bowker, Douglas Bolton and others
Plaintiff:
William Simpson Edwards
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allamakee County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 4:2018cv00245
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma LP and others
Plaintiff:
Allamakee County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 pl
Watson v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00513
Petitioner:
Charles Watson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Watson et al v. Lacombe et al
as 1:2015cv00046
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Watson and Jane Watson
Defendant:
Rene Lacombe , Travelers Transportation Services Inc. and John Paul Eledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watson et al v. Lacombe et al
as 4:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Watson and Jane Watson
Defendant:
Rene Lacombe , Travelers Transportation Services and John Paul Eledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Watson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2014cv00072
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Gary Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Watson v. USA
as 4:2014cv00071
Petitioner:
Aaron Deshawn Watson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brandon Dean Watson v. Richmond, et al
as 4:2013cv00433
Defendant:
Office of Jefferson County Sheriff, Iowa and Bart Richmond
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dean Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00326
Petitioner:
Charles Samuel Watson, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Watson v. State of Iowa
as 4:2013cv00172
Petitioner:
Cecil Watson
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
