Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Roland v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2019cv00285
Plaintiff:
Michele Roland
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. Peterson et al
as 4:2019cv00128
Defendant:
Adam Derr, John Hawk, Michelle Waddle and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Daniels
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Thies et al
as 4:2018cv00468
Defendant:
Michelle DeLong, City of West Des Moines, Stacie Huisman and others
Plaintiff:
Mary A Clayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp
Asbury v. ISP et al
as 4:2018cv00319
Defendant:
ISP, SURC Committee, Chapel Charles Marmer and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Asbury
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bustillos v. ISP et al
as 4:2018cv00322
Plaintiff:
Sabastian Bustillos
Defendant:
ISP, SURC Committee, Chapel Charles Marmer and others
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. ISP et al
as 4:2018cv00321
Defendant:
ISP, SURC Committee, Chapel Charles Marmer and others
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Gonzalez
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bloch v. ISP et al
as 4:2018cv00324
Defendant:
ISP, SURC Committee, Chapel Charles Marmer and others
Plaintiff:
Demetreis Bloch
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. ISP et al
as 4:2018cv00325
Defendant:
ISP, SURC Committee, Chapel Charles Marmer and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Martinez
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piper v. ISP et al
as 4:2018cv00317
Plaintiff:
Kieth M. Piper
Defendant:
ISP, SURC Committee, Chapel Charles Marmer and others
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Province v. ISP et al
as 4:2018cv00318
Defendant:
ISP, SURC Committee, Chapel Charles Marmer and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Province
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
