Cases 61 - 70 of 104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00442
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Barnett v. Swope et al
as 4:2015cv00421
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Barnett
Defendant:
Chris Swope , Jason Fuller and Wapello County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Linn County Sherriff et al
as 4:2015cv00416
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eziel Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
Heather OBrien, Ireland, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Applegate v. Davis, et al.
as 4:2015cv00246
Plaintiff:
Daniel Aaron Applegate
Defendant:
Dallas County, Iowa, Dallas County Sheriff's Department, Chad Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arp v. Cerro Gordo County Sheriff et al
as 4:2015cv00242
Plaintiff:
Felix Allen Arp
Defendant:
Cerro Gordo County Sheriff and Matt Dale Klunder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Good v. Warren County, Iowa et al
as 4:2015cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Good
Defendant:
Warren County, Iowa, Warren County Sheriff's Department and Brian Vos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindle et al v. Scott County Sheriff's Department
as 3:2015cv00002
Plaintiff:
Dale Allen Lindle and Mirian Isabel Parada de Lindle
Defendant:
Scott County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rife v. Three Unknown Sheriff Deputies of Marion County et al
as 4:2014cv00373
Plaintiff:
Randall Clay Rife
Defendant:
Three Unknown Sheriff Deputies of Marion County and Gary Verwers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matlock v. Black Hawk County Sheriff's Department
as 4:2014cv00310
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Matlock
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Azbill v. Lee County Sheriff Department
as 4:2014cv00280
Plaintiff:
Darrell Floyd Azbill
Defendant:
Farmer, Sheriff and Rhonda Brobston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
