Cases 51 - 60 of 11,146
Titus v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03146
Plaintiff:
Adam Titus
Defendant:
LaToya Hughes, Brittany Greene, Tara Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Trusewych
as 3:2024cv03147
Plaintiff:
Brian Buchanan
Defendant:
Zorian Trusewych and IDOC Administrative Review Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kruger v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 1:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
Joshua W Kruger
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Cheryl Hansen, Mindi Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trainauskas v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Brian Trainauskas
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galmore v. Campbell et al
as 3:2024cv03145
Plaintiff:
Kelton Galmore
Defendant:
Jack Campbell, Larry Beck, Aaron Conard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cisco v. Killian et al
as 2:2024cv02094
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
Andrew Killian and Matthew Fitton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotton v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02084
Plaintiff:
James Cotton
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Felicia Atkins, Chase Wilhelm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Njus v. Warden McClean County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv01154
Petitioner:
Joel Njus
Respondent:
Warden McClean County Detention Center
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crayton v. People of Illinois
as 1:2024cv01209
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
People of Illinois
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Onwuameze
as 3:2024cv03144
Plaintiff:
Lerin Hughes
Defendant:
Obiora Onwuameze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
