Cases 101 - 110 of 142
Moore v. Hicks et al
as 1:2012cv01107
Plaintiff:
Robert . Moore
Defendant:
Bryce W Hicks, Scott Hill, David A Lingle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Menken v. Hill Correctional Center
as 1:2011cv01465
Plaintiff:
Eric J Menken
Defendant:
Hill Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Younker et al
as 2:2011cv02255
Defendant:
Tamara Younker, Brenda Batts, Janiya Boatman and others
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Smego et al v. Ashby et al
as 3:2011cv03395
Plaintiff:
Richard M Smego, Jeremy Schloss, Charles Brand and others
Defendant:
Forrest J Ashby, James Clayton, Marie Durant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brodzki v. City of North Richland Hills
as 2:2011cv02238
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Brodzki
Defendant:
City of North Richland Hills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Pontiac Correctional Center et al
as 1:2011cv01368
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
Pontiac Correctional Center, Hill Correctional Center, Lawrence Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brodzki v. City of North Richland Hills
as 3:2011cv03358
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brodzki
Defendant:
City of North Richland Hills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schloss et al v. Ashby et al
as 3:2011cv03337
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Schloss, Ronald Levi, Don Evans and others
Defendant:
Forest Ashby, Alfreda Kibby, Larry J Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Aramark Correctional Services LLC et al
as 3:2011cv03291
Plaintiff:
Dorsey Hill
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services LLC, Larry J Phillips, Alfreda Kibby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2011cv01248
Plaintiff:
George Johnson and Danyta S Hill
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Knox County and City of Galesburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
