Cases 11 - 20 of 205
Davis v. McLean County et al
as 1:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Christiaan David Davis
Defendant:
McLean County, William Yoder, William Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NECA-IBEW Welfare Trust Fund et al v. D. LEWIS ELECTRIC, INC.
as 2:2023cv02010
Plaintiff:
NECA-IBEW Welfare Trust Fund and NECA-IBEW Pension Fund
Defendant:
D LEWIS ELECTRIC INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Lewis v. Wight et al
as 1:2022cv01470
Plaintiff:
Agualor Lewis
Defendant:
. Wight, Carmisha Turner, Brad Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Asbell et al
as 1:2022cv01284
Plaintiff:
Chauncie J Lewis
Defendant:
Brian Asbell, E Fandel, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. USA
as 1:2022cv01238
Petitioner:
Lewis L Clark
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Simmons v. Drazewski et al
as 1:2022cv01214
Plaintiff:
Bradley Simmons
Defendant:
. Drazewski, Ron Lewis and McLean County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Asbell
as 1:2022cv01066
Petitioner:
Chauncie J Lewis
Respondent:
Brian Asbell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timmerman v. Rankin et al
as 2:2022cv02044
Plaintiff:
Karlie Timmerman
Defendant:
Jimmy Rankin, Kyle Childress, Haley Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Stone et al
as 1:2022cv01027
Plaintiff:
Rakeem Harris
Defendant:
Adam Stone, Taylor Turner, Donald Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chariot Campbell v. Officer Swanson et al
as 4:2022cv04013
Plaintiff:
Chariot Campbell
Defendant:
Officer Swanson, Lisa Zimmerman, Elena Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
