Cases 21 - 30 of 24,451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Swartz v. Owens et al
as 1:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Henry Swartz
Defendant:
Russell Owens, Kelly Nelson, Daniel Rainy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matlick v. Zimmerman et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Cobretti Matlick
Defendant:
William Zimmerman, . Stinder and . Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2024cv02140
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ramos
Defendant:
. Gonzalez, Kim .., Jody Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Danner et al
as 2:2024cv02141
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ramos
Defendant:
Kim Danner, Ellen Hayes and Becky Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salmon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv04104
Plaintiff:
Maxi L Salmon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ellis v. Wills
as 1:2024cv01222
Petitioner:
Howard Ellis
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark-Bey v. East Peoria Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
Tony Clark-Bey
Defendant:
East Peoria Police Department and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cousino v. Tharaldson Hospitality Management
as 2:2024cv02138
Plaintiff:
Amanda Cousino
Defendant:
Tharaldson Hospitality Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
