Cases 31 - 40 of 228
Wester v. Brookhart et al
as 1:2022cv01366
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Wester
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, Tiffanie Clark, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ambrose v. Doe
as 1:2022cv01276
Plaintiff:
Jamison Christopher Ambrose, Jr
Defendant:
John Doe and Tiffanie Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. USA
as 1:2022cv01238
Petitioner:
Lewis L Clark
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adams v. Illinois River Medical Staff et al
as 1:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
Kahlus Adams
Defendant:
Illinois River Medical Staff and Tiffany Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2022cv01217
Plaintiff:
Carlos Padilla, III, Everett Clinton, Keith Beard and others
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffries, Cherryl Hinthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMahon v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01198
Plaintiff:
Scott McMahon
Defendant:
Brad Johnson, "Jane" Ellinger, "Jane" King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Clark
as 3:2022cv03109
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Renee L Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jones v. Clark
as 2:2022cv02080
Petitioner:
Mark Jones
Respondent:
Tiffanie Clark
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huckabee v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01084
Plaintiff:
John Huckabee
Defendant:
Tiffanie Clark, Tracey Bordner, Shawn M Thrush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
