Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fukama-Kabika v. Jones
as 2:2024cv02091
Petitioner:
Jean A Fukama-Kabika
Respondent:
Chance Jones
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giles v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Giles
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Chance Jones, Cherryle Hinthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Katava et al
as 1:2022cv01255
Plaintiff:
Chance T Brown
Defendant:
Erica L Katava, Thomas R Ysursa, Court of Claims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Katava et al
as 3:2022cv03144
Plaintiff:
Chance T Brown
Defendant:
Erica L Katava, Thomas R Ysursa, Court of Claims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Macon County Jail
as 2:2021cv02280
Plaintiff:
James Smith, Bruce Brady, George Austin and others
Defendant:
Macon County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ternaprovich et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01258
Plaintiff:
James Ternaprovich, Mario Reyes, Ronald T Franz and others
Defendant:
Louis Shicker, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Warnisher et al
as 3:2015cv03057
Plaintiff:
Yvonkia Stewart
Defendant:
Chance Warnisher, Amy L Maddox, Springfield Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v Brown et al
as 3:2012cv03330
Plaintiff:
George H Dawson
Defendant:
Michael Brown , Chance Warnisher and Steve Stirmell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Stephen et al
as 2:2009cv02046
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Larry F Stephen, Sheila . Edward and Second Chance Saloon Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
