Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 66
First National Property Management L.L.C v. May
as 3:2024mc03005
Petitioner: First National Property Management L.L.C
Respondent: James May
Mays v. Schiller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv03026
Plaintiff: Teah Mays
Defendant: Luke Schiller, Ryan Schiller and Melissa Schiller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffin v. Monopoly et al
as 4:2024cv04017
Plaintiff: Jeramiah J Griffin
Defendant: Monopoly, Knox County Jail, Jack Harlan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01353
Plaintiff: Felisha Reneea Mays
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sutton v. Speer et al
as 1:2023cv01185
Plaintiff: Randall Trevet Sutton and Sarah Sutton
Defendant: . Speer and . May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Social Security
as 1:2023cv01131
Plaintiff: Lauren May Haynes
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Esperon v. May
as 1:2022cv01355
Plaintiff: Patricia Esperon
Defendant: Scott May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02140
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Featherstun et al
as 1:2022cv01069
Plaintiff: Gabriel L Williams
Defendant: Sean Featherstun, Matt Vaughn, Jerry Crisel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayford v. McLean County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01129
Defendant: Jon Sandage, Thomas Schroeder, McLean County and others
Plaintiff: Latasha Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?