Cases 1 - 10 of 15
DeVost v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv03010
Plaintiff:
Melvin DeVost
Defendant:
Dale Davis, Joshua Davis, Matthew Dowis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2020cv03228
Defendant:
Oglesby, Orquiz Rios, City of Springfield and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lajuane Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudolph v. McLean County States Attorney et al
as 1:2019cv01087
Defendant:
Mary Koll, David Fitt, McLean County Sheriffs Department and others
Plaintiff:
Houston Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudolph v. Bergman et al
as 1:2018cv01089
Plaintiff:
Houston Rudolph
Defendant:
. Bergman, Illinois State Police and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudolph v. McLean County Circuit Clerk
as 1:2018cv01061
Plaintiff:
Houston Rudolph
Defendant:
McLean County Circuit Clerk, J Karnats and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Thomas v. Sangamon County State's Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2016cv03193
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
Sangamon County State's Attorney's Office, State of Illinois, Karen Tharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eberhardt v. Braud et al
as 3:2016cv03153
Plaintiff:
Don F Eberhardt
Defendant:
Rudolph Braud, Jr, Leslie Graves and April Troemper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eberhardt v. Graves et al
as 3:2016cv03080
Plaintiff:
Don F Eberhardt
Defendant:
Aura Monica Ebhardt, Peggy J Ryan, Jackson Donley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudolph v. Stateville Correctional Center
as 3:2014cv03102
Plaintiff:
Houston Rudolph
Defendant:
Stateville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudolph v. McLean County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2014cv01097
Plaintiff:
Houston Rudolph
Defendant:
McLean County Detention Facility and McLean County Detention Facility Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
