Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wallace v. Hale et al
as 2:2024cv02123
Plaintiff:
Katrina Wallace
Defendant:
Danielle Hale, Karyn Conner and US Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chacon v. Downey et al
as 2:2023cv02161
Plaintiff:
Cosme Chacon
Defendant:
. Downey and US Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gunter v. US Marshal Service et al
as 4:2021cv04090
Plaintiff:
Buddy Hal Gunter
Defendant:
Tracy Burgard, Jane Doe, Lou Glossip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunter v. US Marshal Service et al
as 4:2021cv04086
Plaintiff:
Buddy Hal Gunter
Defendant:
Tracy Burgard, Advance Correctional Health Care Inc, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Besser v. US Marshals Service
as 1:2016cv01239
Plaintiff:
George Terrance Besser
Defendant:
US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. US Marshal Service et al
as 2:2014cv02211
Plaintiff:
Joseph Miller
Defendant:
US Marshal Service, Tim Bukowski, Michael Downey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonassen v. US Marshal Service et al
as 2:2013cv02175
Plaintiff:
Martin Jonassen
Defendant:
US Marshal Service, Bureau of Prisons, Kankakee County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Newell v. Jerome Combs Detention Center et al
as 2:2013cv02018
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center, Kankakee County Sheriff's Department, Timothy Bukowski and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Newell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beshears v. Merritt et al
as 2:2010cv02152
Plaintiff:
Vantice L Beshears, Jr
Defendant:
Milissa Merritt, United States Probation Office, Lynea T Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. US Marshal Service
as 3:2008cv03053
Plaintiff:
Spencer Harris
Defendant:
US Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
