General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Before Judge Matthew Kennelly
Cases 1 - 10 of 178
Barry v. Farano et al
as 1:2024cv01418
Petitioner: Marie Barry
Respondent: Robert Farano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cochran v. Jones
as 1:2024cv01275
Petitioner: Jeremiah Cochran
Respondent: Cherryle Hinthorne and Chance Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dyson v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv05277
Petitioner: Stefannie Dyson
Respondent: State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. Hain et al
as 1:2023cv04219
Petitioner: Deandre Bradley
Respondent: Ron Hain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paape v. Baker et al
as 1:2023cv03802
Petitioner: Anson Paape
Respondent: Tyrone Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Mitchell
as 1:2023cv02725
Petitioner: Elver Hernandez
Respondent: David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dyson v. Circuit Court of Cook County We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02521
Petitioner: Stefannie Dyson
Respondent: Thomas Dart and Circuit Court of Cook County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arrellano v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv00461
Petitioner: Mariano G. Arrellano
Respondent: Tarry Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nissenbaum v. Eddy
as 1:2022cv07159
Petitioner: Nathan Nissenbaum
Respondent: Melinda Eddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Isom v. Clark
as 1:2022cv05269
Petitioner: Brochers Isom
Respondent: People of the State of Illinois and Tiffanie Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?