Cases 61 - 70 of 1,135
Grissom v. Dehaan, et al
as 1:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Terrance Grissom
Defendant:
Sue Dehaan and Billie Salaam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrellano v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv00461
Petitioner:
Mariano G. Arrellano
Respondent:
Tarry Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williamson v. Mau et al
as 1:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
DeAnthony E. Williamson
Defendant:
Donna Mau, Andrea L. Chasteen, Vincent F. Cornelius and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Artis v. Thornton et al
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Montez Artis
Defendant:
Pimone Thornton, Thomas Scott, David Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Edgcomb et al
as 1:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Roderick Lavar Coleman
Defendant:
Jason Edgcomb, Shelley Kessler, Eric Ratliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nissenbaum v. Eddy
as 1:2022cv07159
Petitioner:
Nathan Nissenbaum
Respondent:
Melinda Eddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Brown et al
as 1:2022cv07038
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Defendant:
Greg Brown and Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv07095
Plaintiff:
Tirnell Williams
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County of Illinois, Roxane Boutee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Cermak Health Services Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv06968
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services Corporation and Toni Perwinkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hain et al
as 1:2022cv06791
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Smith
Defendant:
Ron Hain, c/o Bowers, c/o Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
