Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Nefer Neb v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03787
Plaintiff:
Ken Nefer Neb and Darrell McKee
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, John or Jane Doe, Iris Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weathers v. Mershon et al
as 3:2024cv50130
Plaintiff:
Lamon Weathers, Lil Trave, Paco and others
Defendant:
Kristine Mershon, Ms. A. Scott, Ronald Ostrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brisco v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv04114
Plaintiff:
Steshawn Brisco
Defendant:
Tom Dart, John Does & Jane Does, J. Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Heffelfinger et al
as 3:2023cv50054
Plaintiff:
Nirin Walls
Defendant:
Nurse Heffelfinger, Ditzler, Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv50403
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Mr. Johnson, Bergami, A. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hunt v. Bergami et al
as 3:2022cv50360
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hunt
Defendant:
Warden Bergami, Warden Gonzales, Warden A. Ciolli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv50330
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
United States, Dols, Barmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. BMO Harris Bank et al
as 1:2022cv04790
Plaintiff:
Ardamis Darrell Sims
Defendant:
BMO Harris Bank, Jane Doe and John and Janes Doe(s) of BMO Harris Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. John Does et al
as 3:2022cv50304
Plaintiff:
Tony Jackson
Defendant:
John Does, Sonja Nicklaus, John Varga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ojeda v. Hain et al
as 1:2022cv03623
Plaintiff:
Luis Ojeda, III
Defendant:
Kane County Sheriff Hain, Officer Hernandez, Officer Gary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
