Cases 51 - 60 of 255
Lee v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv06538
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Thomas J Dart and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy B Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Chmell et al
as 1:2020cv04564
Defendant:
PYG2 Leonard Onsen, MD PYG Matthew Steffes, MD Samuel Schmell and others
Plaintiff:
Donzell Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv04136
Defendant:
Unknown Correctional Officer, Tom Dart and Lt. Johnson
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanchard v. Nicklaus et al
as 3:2020cv50170
Defendant:
Luis Castillo, Andrea Tack and Sonja Nicklaus
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lee Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Gosh, et al
as 1:2020cv00088
Plaintiff:
James Lee Dorsey
Defendant:
Gosh, Carter, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Thomas et al
as 1:2020cv00090
Plaintiff:
James Lee Dorsey
Defendant:
Thomas, Monica Williams, Colleen Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogan v. Cook County
as 1:2019cv08431
Defendant:
Cook County
Plaintiff:
Lee Bogan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruffin, Jr. v. Advanced Corrections Health Care, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv50347
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Dave White, Colleen Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny M. Ruffin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Illinois Department of Corrections Stateville Northern Reception Center et al
as 1:2019cv06423
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections Stateville Northern Reception Center, Illinois Department of Corrections Sheridan Correctional Center and Kane County Jail
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lee Flowers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Lee et al
as 1:2019cv04937
Defendant:
Jennifer Lee, Bryant Chua, Lake County, Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Awaan Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
