Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Watson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv50001
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation, Illinois Department of Corrections, Latoya Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokich v. Diss et al
as 1:2023cv14159
Plaintiff:
Michael D Stokich
Defendant:
Adam Diss, . Hill, . Cravatta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Malkowski et al.
as 1:2019cv07211
Defendant:
Medical Technician Bobby, Mary Ellen Grennan, Unknown Health Care Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Illinois Department Of Corrections(IDOC) et al
as 3:2018cv50068
Plaintiff:
Willie Hall
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections(IDOC), Amber Allen, Kristina Mershon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. McGarvey et al
as 1:2016cv02471
Plaintiff:
Edward C Hanks
Defendant:
Jenny L McGarvey, Karen Rabideau, Terri Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley El v. Godinez et al
as 1:2015cv11180
Plaintiff:
William D. Riley El
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Joseph Yurkovich, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Brown et al
as 1:2014cv09622
Plaintiff:
Jamal Taylor
Defendant:
Royce Brown, Doctor Obaisi, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Obasi et al
as 1:2014cv09624
Plaintiff:
Jamal Taylor
Defendant:
Obasi, Medical Provider Wexford Sources Inc., M Mikaitis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Brown et. al
as 1:2014cv09621
Plaintiff:
Jamal Taylor
Defendant:
Royce Brown, Doctor Obaisi, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramey v. Godinez et al
as 1:2014cv00619
Plaintiff:
Irving Ramey
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Marcus Hardy, Nancy Pounivich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
