Cases 31 - 40 of 227
Gummow v. Monyelle et al
as 3:2022cv50433
Plaintiff:
Bradley Frederick Gummow
Defendant:
Cameron Monyelle, Sawyer Kurth, James Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seri v. Adams
as 1:2022cv06829
Plaintiff:
Sossane Pierre-Michel Seri
Defendant:
Police Station of Bolingbrook Illinois
Respondent:
Dave Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Godfrey et al v. City Of Joliet et al
as 1:2022cv06708
Plaintiff:
Toby Godfrey
Defendant:
City Of Joliet, Lukasz Gal, Adam Rosales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooper v. County of Will, et al
as 1:2022cv03076
Plaintiff:
George L. Hooper
Defendant:
County Of Will, Michael Kelly, Dale Santerelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Diss et al
as 1:2022cv02192
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Hawkins
Defendant:
Adam Diss, Jason Edgcomb and Jaculine Underhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mansoori v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv01642
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Mansoori
Defendant:
John Doe, C.O. Adams, C.O. Mintah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. W.C.A.D.F. et al
as 1:2022cv01415
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
W.C.A.D.F., Dale Santerelli, Bernadette Landeros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hearns v. Young et al
as 3:2021cv50476
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Hearns
Defendant:
John H. Young, Josh Adam Versluys and Tricia Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proctor et al v. Santerelli et al
as 1:2021cv06634
Plaintiff:
William H. Proctor, Jemuel H. Westbrooks, Ceandre Moore and others
Defendant:
Warden D. Santerelli, Chief Perillo, Chief Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proctor v. Santerelli et al
as 1:2021cv06513
Plaintiff:
Richard H. Proctor
Defendant:
Warden D. Santerelli, Chief Perillo, Chief Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
