Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Moore v. Love et al
as 3:2024cv50021
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Defendant:
Lt. Love, Sgt. Meyers, Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 1:2023cv14204
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Kim Foxx, Michael Blaha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. City of Loves Park Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv50273
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE ANTON HAMPTON
Defendant:
CITY OF LOVES PARK ILLINOIS, WINNEBAGO COUNTY ILLINOIS, CITY OF LOVES PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gully Jr. v. Ditzler et al
as 3:2023cv50275
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Gully Jr.
Defendant:
C/O Ditzler, Olwenski, Bolin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fort v. Harris et al
as 3:2023cv50265
Plaintiff:
Lonnell Isiah Fort
Defendant:
Lindsey Harris, Mickey Gates, Asa Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ramos v. Koltiwenzew et al
as 1:2022cv07301
Plaintiff:
Feliberto Flores Ramos
Defendant:
Chad Koltiwenzew, Todd, Corporal Bartucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv05492
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
Lt. B. Johnson, C/O Love, Wexford Health Sources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisle, Jr. et al v. Simpson et al
as 1:2022cv05137
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Lisle, Jr.
Defendant:
L. Simpson, Hoffman, Rockwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv02840
Plaintiff:
Javar Dell Love
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Supt. Citron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv02708
Plaintiff:
Javar D. Love
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Citron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
