Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Fischer v. Correctional Officer Golden et al
as 1:2024cv04862
Plaintiff:
Ricky L Fischer
Defendant:
Golden, Tom Dart, Joseph Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown, Jr. v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50110
Plaintiff:
Allen Brown, Jr. and Blue
Defendant:
Andrea Tack, Wende, Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Wilks et al
as 1:2023cv15506
Plaintiff:
Torrance Butler
Defendant:
Justin Wilks, Michael Remmers, Sammy Forrest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv50371
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Robinson
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, District One Parole Re-Entry Group Deputy Chief, District One Parole Re-Entry Group Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElrath, Sr. v. Henson et al
as 3:2023cv50181
Plaintiff:
Sean D. McElrath, Sr.
Defendant:
Ms. Henson, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv50073
Plaintiff:
Jacob Cecil
Defendant:
C/O Hannah Smith, Nickels, Lt. Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godfrey et al v. City Of Joliet et al
as 1:2022cv06708
Plaintiff:
Toby Godfrey
Defendant:
City Of Joliet, Lukasz Gal, Adam Rosales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Venard et al
as 1:2022cv01204
Plaintiff:
Antonio Anthony Shaw
Defendant:
Venard, Gaston, Grunwalnard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shaw, Jr. v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50417
Petitioner:
Viagales Levert Shaw, Jr. and Vyagales Levert Shaw, Jr.
Respondent:
Ciolli and Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Shaw et al
as 1:2021cv00633
Defendant:
Douglas Palmer, G. Mantis, City of Joliet and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
