Cases 91 - 100 of 291
Seyfarth Shaw LLP v. Ridgeway
as 1:2017cv07972
Plaintiff:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Defendant:
Christopher M. Ridgeway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doby v. Ross et al
as 1:2017cv07655
Plaintiff:
Randy Doby
Defendant:
J. Ross, A. Kramer, N. Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
River Light V, L.P. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv05999
Plaintiff:
River Light V, L.P. and Tory Burch LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhou Ping, Zhou Bing and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Century National Insurance Company v. GT Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04764
Plaintiff:
Century National Insurance Company
Defendant:
GT Transport, Inc., Grainco FS, Inc. and Grace Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stovall v. McCarty et al
as 1:2017cv04762
Plaintiff:
Grace L Stovall
Defendant:
Amy McCarty, Ingrid Brown, Jamie Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shaw v. Hammers et al
as 1:2017cv03948
Petitioner:
Donald A Shaw
Respondent:
Justin Hammers and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
French v. Chief of Police et al
as 1:2017cv03662
Plaintiff:
Shamus L. French
Defendant:
Chief of Police, Lt. Baugh, Off. Sitkaukas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Shaw et al
as 1:2017cv02053
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Joel Shaw, Charles Best, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. et al
as 1:2017cv01671
Plaintiff:
James Shaw
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.., Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
