Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Parks et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2013cv00639
Plaintiff: Terrance Parks , Philip A Goin , Oliver I. Felton and others
Defendant: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Goins v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv04057
Plaintiff: Krystal L. Goins
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hunt v. Roth et al
as 1:2011cv04697
Defendant: Robert R. Roth, Matthew T. Diblich, Timothy J. Belcik and others
Plaintiff: Antwoin Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07002
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Walker v. Walker et al
as 1:2009cv03461
Plaintiff: Clarence Walker
Defendant: Roger E. Walker, Jr., Sue Redshaw, Tara Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goins v. Philip Morris USA Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00118
Plaintiff: Vicki Goins
Defendant: Philip Morris USA Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
James v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv03273
Plaintiff: Detrick James
Defendant: City of Chicago, H. G. Salgado and R. T. Goins
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goins v. Corbitt
as 1:2007cv07209
Plaintiff: Leonard Goins, Leonard Goins, Leonard Goins and others
Defendant: P.O. Corbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goins v. Astrue
as 1:2007cv07057
Plaintiff: Albert Goins
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Goins v. Rizzo et al
as 1:2007cv05543
Plaintiff: Ronald Lamont Goins
Defendant: P.O. Rizzo, P.O. Mielcarz and Darius Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?