Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Kemp et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06744
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Kemp and Gail R. Kemp
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc and GlaxoSmith Kline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore et al v. Flavor Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01566
Plaintiff:
Ashley M Moore , Derrick L. Burns and DeMarcus Brydie
Defendant:
Flavor Restaurant, Inc., Rochelle Kemp and James Kemp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harris-Kemp v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00816
Plaintiff:
Katrina Harris-Kemp
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer OY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burke v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv03565
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burke
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Andrew Kemps and Brian Cahill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Dart et al
as 1:2014cv01352
Plaintiff:
Ronell Anderson
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Officer Ganier, Officer Pleasant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
James v. Hearshe Kemp, LLC
as 1:2013cv00733
Defendant:
Hearshe Kemp, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marlena D. James
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Neal v. Kemp et al
as 1:2012cv10233
Plaintiff:
Cory Neal
Defendant:
Officer Kemp and Officer Cahill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv03127
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
