Cases 21 - 30 of 172
Security and Exchange Commission v. Chavez et al
as 1:2022cv05965
Plaintiff:
Security and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Mauricio Chavez, Giorgio Benvenuto and CryptoFX, LLC
Receiver:
John Lewis, Jr.
Chavez v. AK 22nd., Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05938
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Chavez
Defendant:
AK 22nd., Inc. and Stephen Chacko
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Chavez v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv04077
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Chavez
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Chavez v The City of Chicago, et al
as 1:2022cv00935
Plaintiff:
Iris Chavez
Defendant:
Chicago City of, Ricardo Mendez (Star # 18779), Star #14601 Jose Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trejo Chavez v. Principal Life Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00565
Plaintiff:
Ariadna Trejo Chavez
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Chavez v. Del-Luna et al
as 1:2021cv06900
Plaintiff:
Emilio Cesar Chavez
Defendant:
Del-Luna, Henry, Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gonzalez v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2021cv06243
Plaintiff:
Christian A. Gonzalez
Defendant:
J Rodriguez, D Rasic, A Sacuta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez et al v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv01720
Defendant:
Tyler Fokas (#19036), The City of Chicago, Daanish Waudiwala (#19418) and others
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Delgado and Leslie Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
