Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Cotton v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv03268
Defendant: City Of Chicago, Michael Hammond and Jerry Pentimone
Plaintiff: Dellshawn Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryder v. Hyles et al
as 1:2020cv01153
Plaintiff: Joy Ryder
Defendant: David Hyles, First Baptist Church of Hammond, Indiana, INC. and Hyles- Anderson College, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
French v. Horseshoe Hammond LLC
as 1:2019cv07502
Plaintiff: Winifred French
Defendant: Horseshoe Hammond LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McAfee v. Horseshoe Hammond Casino, LLC
as 1:2019cv06125
Plaintiff: Marian McAfee
Defendant: Horseshoe Hammond Casino, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murry v. Cermak Hospital et al
as 1:2019cv05142
Defendant: Imon, Cermak Hospital, Hammond and others
Plaintiff: Willie Murry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynoso v. LGS Inc, et al
as 1:2019cv04025
Defendant: Aleta Sarno, LGS Inc and Lead Generation Services and/or Lead Generation Specialists, Inc
Plaintiff: Servando Reynoso, Tekela Hammond and Kailei Bonds
Gelita USA, Inc. v. Hammond Water Works Department We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv03268
Plaintiff: Gelita USA, Inc.
Defendant: Hammond Water Works Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02092
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hammond v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02034
Plaintiff: Jennifer Gmerice Hammond
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. , Rasier, LLC , Danielle Washington and others
Cross_claimant: Rasier, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Danielle Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02991
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?