Cases 31 - 40 of 98
Lumpkins v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv08592
Plaintiff:
Robert Lumpkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, Officer John Doe and Offier Sgt John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christmas v. Officer John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2017cv08554
Plaintiff:
Wendell Earl Christmas
Defendant:
Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #2, Officer John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurman v. Calumet City Police Dept. et al
as 1:2017cv08565
Plaintiff:
Cordell Thurman
Defendant:
Jose Rivas and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. Winnebago County Justice Center et al
as 3:2017cv50326
Plaintiff:
Shardon Ahpree Gay
Defendant:
Winnebago County Justice Center, Shawbecker and Unknown Name Officer/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Quarles et al
as 1:2017cv06094
Plaintiff:
John E. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
D. Quarles, Officer Ross, C Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boykin v. Dixon Correctional Center et al
as 3:2017cv50049
Plaintiff:
Marshaun Boykin
Defendant:
John Varga, Officer(John Doe) and Crisis Watch Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virgil et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv09966
Plaintiff:
Daniel Virgil and Sade Dupree
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Ronald Schmuck and Chicago Police Officers John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paschal v. Anderson et al
as 1:2016cv07071
Plaintiff:
William Paschal
Defendant:
Officer Anderson, Officer John Doe, Sergeant Doody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rashaad Ross v. Det. Rosen et al
as 1:2016cv05167
Plaintiff:
Rashaad Ross
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
Det. Rosen, Officers John Doe 1-2 and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv04560
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Riverdale Police Department, Markham County State Prosecutors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
