Cases 31 - 40 of 120
Romero v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 1:2019cv06722
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Romero-Guiterrez v. Varga
as 1:2019cv05195
Petitioner:
Armando Romero-Guiterrez
Respondent:
John Varga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. Varga et al
as 1:2019cv04991
Respondent:
John Varga
Petitioner:
Ramon Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. Godinez et al
as 1:2018cv06671
Defendant:
David Gomez, Michael Lemke, Counselor Eilts and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv06456
Defendant:
Michael Stutz, Vincent Ciocci, Mark Mendez and others
Plaintiff:
Cornell Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadowski v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv05832
Defendant:
Marina Bekic, Rick V Wilder, Sunil Arora and others
Plaintiff:
Ryszard Sadowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Romero et al
as 1:2017cv07348
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Dennis Romero and JAD Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bulgari, S.p.A. v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The
as 1:2017cv07007
Plaintiff:
Bulgari, S.p.A.
Defendant:
Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The, Wen Jie Xu, Zhao Dequn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv05664
Plaintiff:
Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft and Swarovski North America Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Xiong Hui Liu, XiongHui Liu (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
