Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Shelby v. Caroll et al
as 1:2018cv01480
Plaintiff:
David Shelby
Defendant:
Jeffery Caroll and Steve Meeker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green et al v. Accord Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00925
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc. , Accord Healtcare, Ltd. , Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ameilia Green , Audrey Fridia , Linda Fullmore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shelby v. Group O, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00758
Plaintiff:
Dovie Shelby
Defendant:
Group O, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bibbs v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv00208
Plaintiff:
A.J. Samuel Bibbs
Defendant:
Tom Dart, John Doe, Ruiz Rungle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelby v. City of Chicago Heights Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv08082
Plaintiff:
David Shelby
Defendant:
City of Chicago Heights Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelby v. Meeker et al
as 1:2017cv07979
Plaintiff:
David Shelby
Defendant:
Steve Meeker and Jeffery Caroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelby et al v. White et al
as 3:2017cv50322
Plaintiff:
Tony Shelby and Derrick Shelby
Defendant:
Ron White, Mike Rock, Joe McGraw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray et al v. Cirrus Design Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv07148
Plaintiff:
Gretchen Murray , Haydn Murray , Zane Murray and others
Defendant:
Cirrus Design Corporation and Continental Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shelby v. Cit Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2017cv07086
Plaintiff:
David Shelby
Defendant:
Cit Bank, N.A. and Ciruit Judge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Haynes et al
as 1:2017cv06275
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund and Arthur H. Bunte, Jr
Defendant:
Shelby L. Haynes, N. Gerald Dicuccio, Esq and Butler, Cincione & DiCuccio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
