Cases 41 - 50 of 233
Grimes v. Rivers et al
as 3:2021cv50474
Plaintiff:
Jeffery J. Grimes
Defendant:
Warden Rivers, Warden Ciolli, Kniks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham et al v. Lee County et al
as 3:2021cv50467
Plaintiff:
Phyllis A. Graham and Craig E. Graham
Defendant:
Lee County, Illinois, Sheriff John Simonton, David Janssen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Animal Medical Center of Orland Park, Inc. v. Graham et al
as 1:2021cv05620
Plaintiff:
Animal Medical Center of Orland Park, Inc.
Defendant:
Michele Graham doing business as Wholeful Pet and John Does, 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Lee v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2021cv50393
Plaintiff:
Mario Anton Lee
Defendant:
Andrew Ciolli, Mr. Graham and Ms. Smiddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Doe
as 1:2021cv04008
Plaintiff:
Angelo Graham
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Special Management Review Committee et al
as 1:2021cv03775
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
Special Management Review Committee, D. Altizer, Cpt. Unknown Leonowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Special Management Review Committee et al
as 3:2021cv50289
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
Special Management Review Committee, D. Altizer, Leonowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Karl Knauz Motors, Inc.
as 1:2021cv02931
Defendant:
Karl Knauz Motors, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Raymond Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Roberson v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2021cv01806
Plaintiff:
William Graham Roberson, IV
Defendant:
Cook County Illinois, State of Illinois and Governor JB Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. Holzmeister Group, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01814
Defendant:
Pristine Media Group, LLC, Holzmeister Group, LLC, Graham Gochneaur and others
Plaintiff:
Guaranteed Rate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
