Cases 41 - 50 of 149
Harper v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2020cv00391
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL HARPER, as attorney-in-fact for Doreen Bebbington
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green Dolphin Capital LLC et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv06940
Plaintiff:
Green Dolphin Capital LLC, MK 2011 LLC, Gary Rappeport and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co. d/b/a JPMorgan Private Bank, J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Nazha
as 1:2019cv05088
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
William Callas Nazha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ammons v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2019cv03582
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
William Ammons
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01233
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Holmin et al
as 1:2019cv01842
Defendant:
Jeremy A. Krall, Steven J. Demarco, Jeff W. Demarco and others
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07584
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06341
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
2013 Travis Oak Creek GP, LLP v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2018cv06559
Respondent:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Petitioner:
2013 Travis Oak Creek GP, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McNeal v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems et al
as 1:2018cv05623
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, United States of America and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Plaintiff:
Merlyn McNeal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
