Cases 41 - 50 of 119
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Kucia et al
as 1:2016cv09091
Defendant:
Anton Kucia , Martin Desent III , Brad Desent and others
Plaintiff:
Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Romero v. Exacta, LLC
as 1:2016cv08363
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Romero
Defendant:
Exacta, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv07252
Plaintiff:
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust and Calvin Klein, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Li Chen, Li Pinglong and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Romero-Arrizabal v. Ramos et al
as 1:2016cv05967
Plaintiff:
Francisco Alberto Romero-Arrizabal
Defendant:
Fernando Ramos and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Jaspar et al
as 3:2016cv50057
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Romero
Defendant:
Robert Jaspar, Shawn Knight, Dennis Christen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Vance & Huffman, LLC
as 1:2016cv01085
Plaintiff:
Rosa Romero
Defendant:
Vance & Huffman, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Velazquez et al v. Pugsley & LaHaie Landscaping, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01028
Plaintiff:
Ivan Velazquez , Enrique Aguiran Belem , Dorian Arteaga and others
Defendant:
Pugsley & LaHaie Landscaping, LLC , Apex Landscaping, LLC and Robert Atwater
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Doe vs. City Of Chicago et al.
as 1:2016cv00733
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , F. Perez, R. Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 1:2015cv09109
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sean Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
