Cases 51 - 60 of 75
Roberson v. Wilks et al
as 1:2021cv04673
Petitioner:
Willie L Roberson
Respondent:
Warden Wilks and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McHenry County et al v. Raoul
as 3:2021cv50341
Plaintiff:
McHenry County and Kankakee County
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Reform Law Institute and National Immigrant Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Adamczyk v. Morgenthaler
as 1:2021cv01535
Respondent:
Mr Taylor, Kwame Raoul and Greg Morgenthaler
Petitioner:
Lawrence Adamczyk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tranchita v. Callahan et al
as 1:2020cv05956
Defendant:
John Fischer, Joshua Mooi, Director colleen callahan and others
Plaintiff:
Tomi Tranchita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Raoul
as 1:2020cv05916
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul
Plaintiff:
Huguette Nicole Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Redmond v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv05872
Respondent:
Kwame Raoul and Thomas Dart
Petitioner:
Carl Redmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2020cv05460
Respondent:
Kwame Raoul, Nichols and State of Illinois
Petitioner:
Clarence Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adamczyk v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2020cv03291
Respondent:
Kwame Raoul, Warden Sullivan, State of Illinois and others
Petitioner:
Lawrence Adamczyk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Presta et al v. Cook County College Teachers Union et al
as 1:2020cv02723
Defendant:
Andrea R. Waintroob, Kwame Raoul, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Illinois, South Suburban College and others
Plaintiff:
Salvatore Presta, Joel Marcano, Margo Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prim et al v. Raoul, in his official capacity as the Illinois Attorney General
as 3:2020cv50094
Plaintiff:
David Snyders, Mike Downey, Bill Prim and others
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
