Cases 71 - 80 of 94
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Horton v. Yu Do
as 1:2012cv01231
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Horton
Defendant:
Yank Yu Do
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biddle v. Wrobel et al
as 1:2012cv00356
Plaintiff:
Nikita Biddle
Defendant:
Garrent Anthony Wrobel, Joshua Michael Horton and Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Cook County et al
as 1:2011cv08344
Plaintiff:
Sherman Horton
Defendant:
Sheriff of Cook County, Cook County Illinois and Correctional Officer Lowery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laborers' Pension Fund et al v. Horton Farms, Inc.
as 1:2011cv06760
Plaintiff:
Laborers' Pension Fund , Laborers' Welfare Fund Of The Health and Welfare Department Of the Construction And General Laborers' District Council Of Chicago And Vicinity and James S. Jorgensen
Defendant:
Horton Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Horton v. Sheriff et al
as 1:2011cv06064
Plaintiff:
Sherman Horton
Defendant:
Sheriff of Cook County, Cook County, Illinois and Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Patel et al
as 1:2011cv06048
Plaintiff:
Joseph Horton
Defendant:
Patel and Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Jackson Park Hospital et al
as 1:2010cv06214
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Horton
Defendant:
Jackson Park Hospital, St. Bernard Hospital and Community Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton et al
as 1:2010cv03968
Plaintiff:
Gloria Horton , Aiesha Horton , Leticia Horton and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Jason E Brown and Chicago Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Rubald #114540 et al
as 1:2009cv07043
Plaintiff:
Seneca Horton, Seneca Horton, Seneca Horton and others
Defendant:
Rubald #114540, John Doe 1-3 and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
