Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Cases 81 - 90 of 150
Battle v. Pfister et al
as 1:2017cv06338
Plaintiff: Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant: Randy Pfister, Garner, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holly v. Hardy et al
as 1:2017cv04501
Defendant: Assistant Warden Edwards, Marcus Hardy, Michael Lemke and others
Plaintiff: David Darnell Holly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. John/Jane Doe et al
as 1:2017cv03352
Plaintiff: Juan Jose Torres
Defendant: Superintendent John/Jane Doe, John/Jane Doe and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago v. Rabideau et al
as 1:2017cv02078
Plaintiff: Fabian Santiago
Defendant: Karen Rabideau, Tarry Williams, Nicholas Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Cook County et al
as 1:2017cv00715
Plaintiff: Jonathan Lewis Ferguson
Defendant: Thomas J. Dart, John/Jane Doe and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gloster v. Tanna et al
as 1:2016cv10428
Defendant: Mr. Tanna, Wexford, Pfister Randy and others
Plaintiff: Kevin D. Gloster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Pfister et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv08718
Defendant: John/Jane Does and Randy Pfister
Plaintiff: Michael Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sroga v. Hondzinski et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv05796
Plaintiff: Kevin Sroga
Defendant: P.O. Hondzinski, Raymound Souchet, LeRoy Kaminiski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Does et al
as 1:2016cv05418
Plaintiff: Michael Thomas
Defendant: John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. John & Jane Does's et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv50125
Plaintiff: James D. Lewis
Defendant: John & Jane Does's and John & Jane Doe's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?