Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Miller v. Davis Staffing
as 1:2022cv05975
Plaintiff:
Joel D Miller
Defendant:
Davis Staffing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv50341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. Cook County Deparment of Corrections
as 1:2019cv03190
Plaintiff:
Sara D Miller
Defendant:
Cook County Deparment of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Duncan et al
as 1:2019cv03043
Plaintiff:
Arthur H. Bunte, Jr. and Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Farah & Farah, P.A., Mark I. Duncan and Andrew D. Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Welfare and Pension Funds v. M. D. Miller Trucking & Topsoil, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00332
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Welfare and Pension Funds
Defendant:
M. D. Miller Trucking & Topsoil, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Miller v. Colvin
as 1:2017cv08884
Plaintiff:
Kevin D Miller
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Miller v. Duni et al
as 1:2016cv07405
Plaintiff:
Vonnie D. Miller
Defendant:
Marko Duni and SCH&T Corporation of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Miller v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2015cv07798
Plaintiff:
Charles D Miller
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly USA, LLC, Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
